モデルGグレンコのエネルギーのモデル

Model G — coined by Victor Gulenko decades ago and represented by the Humanitarian Socionics School, Model G depicts the qualitative changes of energy aspect inside of sociotype in the process of contact with the surrounding.

Function place in the model — the place in the Model G structure, describing a unique set of properties and features the function manifests according to this place.

Why was the energy model developed? The focus of modern socionics should be modeling energy-information processes: how energy generates information — a new order, valuable experience, or proven knowledge in practice. After all, knowledge (information armament), even the most reliable, without the application, is worthless. In order to start using it, you need energy. The impact of a word as a carrier of information on a person or a group of people is ineffective unless energy is produced. That is, there is also need to excite or interest a person (to transfer to a higher energy level). Practicing psychologists, PR specialists and political technologists have known this for a long time: the energy of the psyche begins to come to the fore.

Proceeding from such considerations, an energy model of the psyche has been developed as more closely matching the criterion of optimal vital activity in the material world. The energy model of a socionic object does not abolish Model A, but complements it to a unified model of energy-information metabolism (EIM). It describes qualitative energy transformations within the sociotype in the process of interaction with the surrounding reality.

The energy model consists of four blocks: I. Block of social mission The strongest block by which a person confidently realizes himself in the society (at a remote communicative distance). With the help of this block, the sociotype carrier can regularly solve the complex tasks using his own capabilities with the maximum efficiency. From the point of view of society, a social mission is an extremely concise instruction that describes in detail the social expectations to the carrier of a particular sociotype; that is, what (purpose) and how (means) he must do things throughout his life in society. The block of leadership is characterized by the following: 1. Command function — leading, stable, external. « Captain » of the team, the function of decision-making and resource allocation. Manages through rewards. 2. Realization (creative) function — leading, unstable, external. It implements a mission of the type, introduces it by taking into account local conditions (most fully takes them into account). Acquires energy from the command function.

II. Block of social adaptation With the help of this block, the carrier of the sociotype adapts to social conditions. The survival block is well trained to solve regular tasks that don't require creative efforts: 3. Role function — driven, stable, external. Consciously trained according to social norms. In the absence of external feeding, the activity of this function decreases rather quickly. 4. Triggering (igniting) — driven, unstable, external. Accelerates the activity (the point of imprinting — bookmarking of programs by impulse), launches the sociotype for the implementation of socially significant actions. At close distance, the effect of activation will become the opposite.

III. Block of creative self-realization On this block, the carrier of the sociotype creatively manifests himself at a close communicative distance in a territory that he considers his own. He is able to spontaneously (but not regularly) solve complex non-standard tasks. Actions on the block are demonstrative, aimed at assessing others (or provoking a reaction). This is the block of personal self-affirmation: 5. Demonstrative — leading, unstable, internal. The implementation, in contrast to local conditions; a sudden-impulse action, which attracts the attention of observers. 6. Dual function — driven, stable, internal. Long-term memorization of behavior patterns, habits. The energy feed position (needs feed taken from the environment) sets the smooth way in which the given type can be controlled.

IV. Problematic (inflation) block This is the weakest block, as the actions on it require a lot of effort and are usually not crowned with success. With active actions on this block, inflation occurs; more and more energy is expended until the system overflows and energy splash occurs (it can be compared with a blown and burst soap bubble), as a result of which the energy of the system is depleted (actions are carried out with minimal efficiency). 7. Brake — driven, unstable, internal. Braking as a result of perception. The point of energy loss, the least adequate result, the greatest resistance to loads. 8. Controlling — leading, stable, internal. Control through restriction. The point of least resistance, the most problematic position (the problem of the divergence of words and deeds is "I know, but I cannot."). It controls what is happening in a close environment, dominates, imposes its own opinion, but the carrier of the sociotype is not inclined to actions through this function.

The distribution of energy between the functions of the sociomodel: Command (1) and Demonstrative (5) — Energomaximum functions are energetically strong, possess the lion's share of the total energy consumption of the socionic object; Realization/creative (2) and Dual (6) — Energooptimum functions that take as much energy as needed to solve the current task; Role (3) and Brake (7) — Energominimum functions that support the functioning of the socionic object at the lower energy level; Triggering/igniting (4) and Controlling (8) — Energopessimum — functions convulsively spending the residual energy only in the most extreme case.

Таким образом, ментальное кольцо разрабатывает стратегию личности, а витальное кольцо принимает ее к повседневному исполнению, т. е. отвечает за тактику. Сфера деятельности личности оказывается ограниченной по радиусу. На далеких коммуникативных дистанциях, когда человек общается в социуме, с новыми людьми, доминирует работа ментального кольца — ядра личности. На близких коммуникативных дистанциях ядро личности просматривается с трудом. В действие вступает витальное кольцо, внешняя оболочка, через которую осуществляется энерго-информационный обмен с близкими, хорошо знакомыми людьми.

I. Command Function +1 — Opportunity Intuition He is strong in seeing the promise of new ideas and projects. He is interested in all in the world in the hope of finding something unique, but he quickly abandons ideas that turn out to be unpromising and switches to something new. He has a variety of interests. Often, his hobbies are not related to his main job. He strives to collect all the discoveries and innovations on the issue of interest to him while generating bold, alternative ideas on any issue that only he has to face. Routine and tradition are intolerable. If he is forced to do a job or project that does not involve him, he will give it a completely new turn. He is able to offer a large variety of applications to inventions or discoveries. He is persistent and expansive in the dissemination of his own developments. To ignite an idea, he must make it "his."

8. Controlling function -T — Temporal Intuition ILE constantly monitors the time available. He urges other people, but he manages his own and others' time as he sees fit. Often, he is late or forgets about his promises to do something by an appointed time. Sometimes he is too fussy, sometimes leisurely. The average pace of life cannot be adjusted because he lives according to his own understanding of time. He has a tendency to discuss his questions at an inappropriate time for others, but he will not listen to what he does not feel is timely. He is quite good at predicting the main trends of events because he relies on his thinking of their past flow. He is interested in catastrophes, natural disasters, mass deaths of people and other fateful events.

Закончим рассмотрение соционической модели анализом функциональной специфики каждой из ее восьми позиций. Обращаю внимание читателя, что приводится авторская трактовка модели А, не совпадающая во многих положениях с ее прочтением как Аушрой, так и другими школами соционики.