レイニンが書いたTi(内向論理)

“My logic is the best logic in the world”. It is difficult to convince a Robespierre of anything that contradicts her system of beliefs. She usually has difficulty explaining her own system.〔中略〕A Robespierre just does not instantly accept anything new: she will listen to your arguments, but she needs time to evaluate, review new data, process it and either accept or reject it. She would not agree with you on the spot.

Let's take another type, Maxim. First function here is subjective logic ( ). It is impossible to make this type change their opinion: “The world is, as I understand it”. This mentality ignores objective logic: “If the world is not the way I understand it, too bad for the world”

Принцип “Cogito ergo sum” (“Мыслю, следовательно, существую”) в действительности подходит, пожалуй, только для двух типов, у которых субъектная логика на первой функции (Максим и Робеспьер). Для других принцип существования может быть другим: “Меня любят, значит, я существую”, “Я здоров, значит, я существую”, “Чувствую, значит, существую”, “В мире есть порядок, значит, я существую”, “Действую, значит, существую” — принцип существования у каждого типа свой.

A Hugo and a Hamlet have random logic. They chose random starting points for their reasoning. A Hugo does it quite often. A Hugo may receive an infusion because the formal logic of an explanation seems reasonable, he may accept things, which he does not agree with normally. This type should be aware of the trait and be discerning when things are explained to them.

Mistrust to hypotheses and concepts: “What are you explaining to me?! Give me the data, show me the diagrams, certificates and do not explain anything”. And also: “I am not interested in opinions, tell me what really happened, I need facts, not your ideas”.